<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
        <title>Why Cycle?</title>
        <description></description>
        <link>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/index.php</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 23:44:52 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Phorum 5.2.7</generator>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8091,8091#msg-8091</guid>
            <title>Importing electric bicycle conversion kits</title>
            <link>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8091,8091#msg-8091</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hi, I'm Doug Synder from San Fransisco. I've been interested in electric bicycles for a long time and promoting their use around our country and the world, it's the best way I know of to reduce impacts from fossil fuel burning. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
[REST OF POSTING EDITED BY WhyCycle Admin]<br />
<br />
Sorry Doug. I've removed the rest of your post.<br />
I'm sure you've been told that for marketing purposes, you should &quot;get involved&quot; in forums and weave your advert into an otherwise &quot;helpful&quot; post. Weel, to a certain degree that's true, but to earn the right to do so involves responding in a useful way to people who have questions and including your *very low key* mention of your services within that reply. If you reply to unrelated questions just to squeeze your adverts in I'll censor them but if you answer on-topic questions where your services may be of benefit then I likely wouldn't censor you.<br />
What is a big no-go on this forum though is outright adverts, ie you start threads solely for the purposes of placing your advertising. Poor form and certainly NOT tolerated on WhyCycle.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>California_ebike</dc:creator>
            <category>The WhyCycle Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 14:48:24 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8083,8090#msg-8090</guid>
            <title>Re: Newbie looking to get the right bike</title>
            <link>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8083,8090#msg-8090</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Thanks DocB.<br />
<br />
I'll take a look at the ridgeback range.  Thanks again for the advice.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>bluelad7</dc:creator>
            <category>The WhyCycle Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 19:41:46 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8083,8089#msg-8089</guid>
            <title>Re: Newbie looking to get the right bike</title>
            <link>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8083,8089#msg-8089</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ If you came into my shop I would be pointing you towards the Ridgeback Element or the Ridgeback Dual Trek and that is simply because I am a Ridgeback dealer.  If you look at the detailed specs on those bikes you will find a more even selection of components, at least in my view.  There must be others available but I don't have the detailed knowledge of other makes.<br />
<br />
The dual track has disc brakes but neither have suspension forks.  Personally I agree with Ridgeback in that suspension forks are not needed on bikes designed for riding quickly with limited cross country off roading.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>DocB</dc:creator>
            <category>The WhyCycle Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 18:50:31 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8083,8088#msg-8088</guid>
            <title>Re: Newbie looking to get the right bike</title>
            <link>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8083,8088#msg-8088</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Thanks DocB.  Are there better options out there.  It's costing £650 so needs to be right.  I'm totally undecided because whilst I enjoyed the feel of it I'm just not sure it's the best in that type of range.  From what you have just said I'm assuming this isn't the best in it's field for that sort of price?]]></description>
            <dc:creator>bluelad7</dc:creator>
            <category>The WhyCycle Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 09:15:37 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8083,8087#msg-8087</guid>
            <title>Re: Newbie looking to get the right bike</title>
            <link>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8083,8087#msg-8087</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Don't recommend bikes because essentially you get what you pay for and the way the bike works depends on the retailer you bought it from more than what is painted on the down tube,<br />
<br />
I will make a comment on your selection.  It is absolutely typical of a lot of bikes from the big makers in that it is a right old mish mash of components. A bit of SRAM, a bit of Shimano of different specs, A bit of Hayes, odd hubs (one shimano, one not), probably a cheap bottom bracket.  It is a very good example of a bike that has been specified to look good to the average bike buyer yet meet a price target. It is not a bad bike but it is nowhere near what it pretends to be.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>DocB</dc:creator>
            <category>The WhyCycle Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 07:41:00 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8083,8086#msg-8086</guid>
            <title>Re: Newbie looking to get the right bike</title>
            <link>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8083,8086#msg-8086</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I'm now looking towards a Trek 8.4 DS - Would anyone recommend something similar that maybe better?]]></description>
            <dc:creator>bluelad7</dc:creator>
            <category>The WhyCycle Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 17:20:11 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8083,8085#msg-8085</guid>
            <title>Re: Newbie looking to get the right bike</title>
            <link>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8083,8085#msg-8085</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Thanks for the quick reply.  Sorry I was a little unclear.<br />
<br />
I think I'm looking for a road bike with straight bars (and profiles), with a front suspension. Basically, a bike that can take a few bumps off road, get through the mud in the winter etc whilst predominantly being faster than I can currently pedal on the road with my mtb.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>bluelad7</dc:creator>
            <category>The WhyCycle Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 21:08:32 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8083,8084#msg-8084</guid>
            <title>Re: Newbie looking to get the right bike</title>
            <link>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8083,8084#msg-8084</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I can't make up my mind from your post exactly what sort of a bike you are looking for. Are you wanting to return to road riding but on a bike with straight handlebars or are you looking for an on-off road bike? <br />
If the former then have a look at the Merida S-Presso range which start at £499.99 and go up to £999.99, all have disc brakes. If its more off-road then their Crossway range might suit. <br />
A bit more info would give us a better idea of what you need.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Cotterpin</dc:creator>
            <category>The WhyCycle Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 21:02:06 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8083,8083#msg-8083</guid>
            <title>Newbie looking to get the right bike</title>
            <link>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8083,8083#msg-8083</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hi everyone, great forum and also the sites pretty cool too!<br />
<br />
Decided a little while back that I wanted to get a newer bike.  I currently have a 21 sp hard tail mtb with gripshifters.  Nothing special really.<br />
<br />
A bit of background.  I used to be a roadie in my 20's but now in my 40's and a little bit heavier (!) I've taken to &quot;explorer&quot; riding either on road or off it.  However, whilst on the road I have the tendency to want to go for that &quot;in my 20's speed&quot; but find that I am just spinning the pedals without getting anywhere.  <br />
<br />
I am looking to get something that will be around the 10-12Kg weight, 21-27 gears (with a larger front crank I guess), disk brakes, slimmer tyres than my 2.175 (I think) and profile bars (but not dropped bars).<br />
<br />
I guess most of you will say that this is a custom job but is there anything remotely out there that would help me?  Even if someone says get an &quot;ABC&quot; and mod it using &quot;XYZ&quot; then I'm up for suggestions.<br />
<br />
For info the off road demands aren't demanding in anyway or form.  Far too concerned about breaking anymore bones nowadays!<br />
<br />
Any advice will be much appreciated.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>bluelad7</dc:creator>
            <category>The WhyCycle Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 20:31:20 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8078,8080#msg-8080</guid>
            <title>Re: To build or to buy?</title>
            <link>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8078,8080#msg-8080</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Likewise to Doc's answer, the custiom built option is likely to prove really rather frustrating.<br />
<br />
The first point to conider would be that the archetypal hybrid frame is not normally something that would be available off the peg in a frame only format since custom building of hybrids is a regular request. Most commonly custom builds are undertaken as Doc mentions, to create something which isn't available through mainstream channels, but also distinclty for more sport based cycling (road or mounatin bike racing)<br />
<br />
What may be an option for you though would be to start with an off-the-peg bike and a good retailer, then customise the specifications of your bikes to better suit your needs. Pay particular atention to upgrading wheels and ensuring that those hidden compnents (Headset and bottom bracket) are of appropriate quality. Consider the weight you'll be expecting the bike to transport and buy appropriate quality racks and luggage. Thene invest in a set of on-the-trail essentials for running repairs. Unless you're going into the depths of Eastern Europe, you'll rarely be far away from a reasonable bike dealer, but consider your choices of equipment carefully. P{ointless, for example, getting expensive hydraulic disc brakes if there is unlikely to be a nearby dealer who could fix them up if they go wrong. Stick to standard kit like cantilever or v-brakes.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>WhyCycle? Admin</dc:creator>
            <category>The WhyCycle Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 00:12:33 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8078,8079#msg-8079</guid>
            <title>Re: To build or to buy?</title>
            <link>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8078,8079#msg-8079</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ You build a bike to get something that is not available from a mainstream manufacturer, not because it will cost less.  So if your budget is less than a couple of thousand for each bike then buy the best you can afford off the shelf.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>DocB</dc:creator>
            <category>The WhyCycle Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 18:02:33 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8078,8078#msg-8078</guid>
            <title>To build or to buy?</title>
            <link>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8078,8078#msg-8078</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hello, my partner and I have set a goal to spend a year ( or more ) volunteering in Europe.  We want to use bicycles as our main mode of transport to and from different work sites.  I've been looking into it and from what I've read we will need decent quality hybrid bikes which can come at a premium.  I want to get them together as soon as possible to start training.  We don't have a lot of money and we're squireling away any expendable income for the trip ( we're saving for a year before setting off ).  We are going to be working for food and accomodation and staying in our tent between sites which is when I anticipate the savings will come in handy so the less we spend now the more we can eat then :-).  I know this sounds crazy but we've plateaued for two and a half years and have decided to try out hand at a very different kind of lifestyle.  Anyway, I have some experience building bikes and family members who built bikes for Trek who will help me put them together but as they're American in the US I didn't think they could adequately answer my question of whether it would be more economical to build a bike rather than to buy one?  Would it not be more practical as well considering we can tailor the bikes to our needs?  Or should I not waste my time and just buy them ready made?  Any advice would be greatly appreciated!]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
            <category>The WhyCycle Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 12:58:21 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?4,8072,8072#msg-8072</guid>
            <title>Maternity Worldwide Brighton to Paris Bike Ride - 22nd to 26th August 2012</title>
            <link>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?4,8072,8072#msg-8072</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <strong class="bbcode">Maternity Worldwide – Brighton to Paris Bike Ride - 22nd to 26th August 2012</strong><br />
<br />
All roads lead to the Eiffel Tower and the heart of Paris as we embark on this popular Brighton to Paris Challenge over three days cycling an average of 50 miles a day via cycle paths, canal paths and country roads.<br />
<br />
Maternity Worldwide is the UK's leading charity saving lives in childbirth in developing countries.<br />
<br />
For more information visit our <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow"  href="http://www.maternityworldwide.org/fundraise/individual-fundraising/brighton-to-paris-bike-ride/">website</a> email Kirsty <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow"  href="&#109;&#97;&#105;&#108;&#116;&#111;&#58;&#102;&#117;&#110;&#100;&#114;&#97;&#105;&#115;&#105;&#110;&#103;&#64;&#109;&#97;&#116;&#101;&#114;&#110;&#105;&#116;&#121;&#119;&#111;&#114;&#108;&#100;&#119;&#105;&#100;&#101;&#46;&#111;&#114;&#103;">&#102;&#117;&#110;&#100;&#114;&#97;&#105;&#115;&#105;&#110;&#103;&#64;&#109;&#97;&#116;&#101;&#114;&#110;&#105;&#116;&#121;&#119;&#111;&#114;&#108;&#100;&#119;&#105;&#100;&#101;&#46;&#111;&#114;&#103;</a> or call 01273 234033, don't forget to join us on <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow"  href="http://www.facebook.com/maternityww">Facebook</a> and <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow"  href="http://www.twitter.com/maternityww">Twitter</a><br />
<br />
Thank you!]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Maternity Worldwide</dc:creator>
            <category>Cycling Events</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 13:09:12 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?4,8071,8071#msg-8071</guid>
            <title>Maternity Worldwide Coast to Coast Bike Ride - 3rd to 7th June 2012</title>
            <link>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?4,8071,8071#msg-8071</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ <strong class="bbcode">Maternity Worldwide – Coast to Coast – 3rd to 7th June 2012</strong><br />
<br />
This classic Great British ride covers some of northern England's most rugged &amp; spectacular scenery. Join us on this fantastic ride from Whitehaven to Newcastle Upon Tyne with a choice each day of the 25 mile route or the 65 mile route.  The ride is fully supported and lead by experienced riders who have organised many cycling events both here and overseas.<br />
<br />
Maternity Worldwide is the UK's leading charity saving lives in childbirth in developing countries.<br />
<br />
For more information visit our <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow"  href="http://www.maternityworldwide.org/fundraise/individual-fundraising/coast-to-coast-bike-ride/">website</a> email Kirsty <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow"  href="&#109;&#97;&#105;&#108;&#116;&#111;&#58;&#102;&#117;&#110;&#100;&#114;&#97;&#105;&#115;&#105;&#110;&#103;&#64;&#109;&#97;&#116;&#101;&#114;&#110;&#105;&#116;&#121;&#119;&#111;&#114;&#108;&#100;&#119;&#105;&#100;&#101;&#46;&#111;&#114;&#103;">&#102;&#117;&#110;&#100;&#114;&#97;&#105;&#115;&#105;&#110;&#103;&#64;&#109;&#97;&#116;&#101;&#114;&#110;&#105;&#116;&#121;&#119;&#111;&#114;&#108;&#100;&#119;&#105;&#100;&#101;&#46;&#111;&#114;&#103;</a> or call 01273 234033, don't forget to join us on <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow"  href="http://www.facebook.com/maternityww">Facebook</a> and <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow"  href="http://www.twitter.com/maternityww">Twitter</a><br />
<br />
Thank you!]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Maternity Worldwide</dc:creator>
            <category>Cycling Events</category>
            <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 13:06:43 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8062,8070#msg-8070</guid>
            <title>Re: Need Help, I hate Cycling</title>
            <link>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8062,8070#msg-8070</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Because... oh blimey!<br />
<br />
You should view the gears on your bike not as (in the case of a 3x7 setup) 21 seperate gears. Yes, there are 21 (or 24, 27 or 30 or now even 33) gear combinations, but as Cotterpin said in his reply, there are almost excatly duplicated ratios across the 21 gear combinations meaning that there are significantly less than 21 different gear ratios on a &quot;21 speed&quot; bike.<br />
You should, instead, consider them as three gear ranges; A low gear range with 5 different gears. A mid gear range with 6 or 7 different gears and finally, a high gear range with 5-6 different gears.<br />
<br />
So, if you are in steep ascending landscape, you select your low gear range (smallest chainring)<br />
If you are in steep or moderate descending landscape, you select your high gear range (biggest chainring)<br />
For most other situtions, moderate ascending and descending, you select your mid gear range (and if on tarmac, you possibly alternate between mid and high ranges).<br />
<br />
By having three gear ranges which overlap significantly, you will find that you can minimise the changes of front chainring selection, making your gear transitions smoother.<br />
<br />
Racing bikes (ie the old drop handlebar &quot;I knew I was right about that saddle&quot; type bikes) rarely encounter such steep or diffuclt ascents that the lowest range offered on mountain bikes is required (where the terrain makes the effort required increase). In more recent times, an increasing number of those very same race bikes are now being fitted with triple chainrings. This serves two purposes; it allows the gear ratios within each of the three ranges to be tighter together giving more finite control AND it allows the makers to extend the number of sprockets fitted at the back. Pick any two of the ranges in the diagram and you'll see that at least one sprocket/chainring combination is inadvisable. With three, all sprockets and all chainrings become usable, though not every combination.<br />
<br />
<br />
Murray... Feel free to pick whatever you wish and place in wikipedia (though you'll want to check for typos first ;-) )]]></description>
            <dc:creator>WhyCycle? Admin</dc:creator>
            <category>The WhyCycle Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 22:52:11 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8062,8069#msg-8069</guid>
            <title>Re: Need Help, I hate Cycling</title>
            <link>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8062,8069#msg-8069</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ This begs the question as to why they bother with 3 cogs on the front and not just have 2?<br />
Comments from the forum experts would be interesting.<br />
Thanks]]></description>
            <dc:creator>neilf</dc:creator>
            <category>The WhyCycle Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 21:14:45 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8062,8068#msg-8068</guid>
            <title>Re: Need Help, I hate Cycling</title>
            <link>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8062,8068#msg-8068</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ WoW That really explainst it well.  It certianly should be on Wikipedia. <br />
<br />
That will help tak the worry away as I learn to shift when I go riding with the group next time  (I'm going to print the diagram and take it with me!! (:D )<br />
<br />
Much Thanks, <br />
<br />
Marty]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Marty Robinson</dc:creator>
            <category>The WhyCycle Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 19:32:29 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8062,8067#msg-8067</guid>
            <title>Re: Need Help, I hate Cycling</title>
            <link>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8062,8067#msg-8067</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hi Admin,<br />
<br />
Your diagram and the accompanying explanation is one of the clearest I have ever seen.  Would you by any chance be willing to make the diagram and/or the text available on Wikipedia?  The applicable copyright license is at:<br />
 <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow"  href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_License">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_License</a><br />
and has a half-page summary at the start.<br />
<br />
- Murray]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Murray R Langton</dc:creator>
            <category>The WhyCycle Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 16:37:04 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8062,8066#msg-8066</guid>
            <title>Re: Need Help, I hate Cycling</title>
            <link>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8062,8066#msg-8066</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ The issue is the relatively crude way in which derailleur systems work.<br />
<br />
You have two sets of cogs, connected by a chain.<br />
The front set of cogs (typically 3 nowadays) is known as the chainset/chainrings.<br />
The back set of cogs (anywhere from 7 to 11) is the freewheel or &quot;sprockets&quot;.<br />
<br />
The bicycle chain is pinned together to allow the links to move (so they can go round the sprockets and chainrings) and whilst there is a small amount of lateral movement allowed, the chain essentially wants to travel in a straight line.<br />
<br />
Now consider that both the front chainrings and rear sprockets form straight lines but there are only a few combinations of those front and rear cogs that have a straight line joining them.<br />
<br />
Unless things have changed dramatically in the past few years since I was last involved in sales, the front set of chainrings are offset slightly in favour of higher gears, ie the middlechainring does not form a direct staight line to the middle rear sprocket.<br />
<br />
The &quot;grinding&quot; noises you are experiencing are the direct result of contact between the chain sides and one or other of: the inner faces of the front derailleur, the inner face of a larger chainring than the selected one or the chain riding over the jockey wheels in the rear derailleur (those two small platic toothed wheels in the rear gear machanism that take up the slack in the chain). Most likely are the first two.<br />
<br />
The illustration I've added above hopefully demonstrates the lineups of the various gears (in a 3x7 system).<br />
<br />
<img src="http://demo.i-bikeshop.com/smsimg/uploads/gear-crossovers.png" class="bbcode" alt="http://demo.i-bikeshop.com/smsimg/uploads/gear-crossovers.png" /><br />
<br />
In the left hand illustration, the smallest chainring is selected. As you can see, it lines up very well with the third sprocket and pretty well with sprockets 2 and 4. Even 1 and 5 don't show too much deviation from a straight line, but once we start to look at sprockets 6 and 7, the deviation from straight is becoming quite extreme. Indeed, on 7th sprocket there is a fair chance that the chain will begin to drind on the middle chainring's inner face. Pretty much all shops/stores will tell you to avoid using the smallest chainring with the smallest sprocket simply because the off-line aspect is so great that it will cause premature wear of your chain.<br />
<br />
In the middle illustration, the middle chainring is selected. As you can see, it lines up pretty well with all of the rear sprockets with the exception of the biggest (1) sprocket. The middle chainring to lagest sprocket is advisable not to be used though shouldn't cause excessive damage to the chain. The combination will, however, mean that the chain is almost definite to grind on the inner face of your front derailleur mechanism. It is also possible for the chain to grind on the inner face of the front derailleur in middle -&gt; smallest. For this reason, many better quality front gear shifters used to have (I'm not sure if they still do) two settings for the front mech position, to alleviate this grinding. Back in the days before &quot;indexed&quot; gears, cyclists would regularly adjust the front derailleur position to alleviate any grinding, but with modern index systems, this isn't so easy.<br />
<br />
In the right hand illustration, the largest chainring is selected. Again, you can see that this lines up pretty well with the smallest four sprockets, however the biggest three get progressively more out of line... infact moreso than the combinations on the smallest chainring... because the chainset so offset to favour higher gears. On the biggest chainring, it is never wise to use the two biggest rear sprockets and I also mention that the thrid biggest will, as above, also leave the chain grinding on the inner face of the front derailleur. <br />
<br />
In short; <br />
on the smallest chainring, do not use the smallest 2 sprockets.<br />
on the middle chainring, you can use all rear sprockest but I'd advise avoiding the very biggest<br />
on the biggest chainring, do not use the biggest 2 sprockets and I'd advise not using the third biggest aswell, but this depends upon your specific gear setup.<br />
<br />
Using these poor combinations leads to excessive and premature wear of your chain, chainrings and sprockets AND means you are almost certain to experience the grinding noises you are hearing. <br />
<br />
As Cotterpin has already mentioned, the &quot;no-go&quot; gears are duplicated elsewehere anyway...<br />
counting sprockets left to right (biggest to smallest)...<br />
smallest + 7th =approx= middle + 5th<br />
smallest + 6th =approx= middle + 4th<br />
biggest + 1st =approx= middle + 4th<br />
biggest + 2nd =approx= middle + 5th]]></description>
            <dc:creator>WhyCycle? Admin</dc:creator>
            <category>The WhyCycle Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 23:05:41 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8062,8065#msg-8065</guid>
            <title>Re: Need Help, I hate Cycling</title>
            <link>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8062,8065#msg-8065</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ I am a bit worried by your description - calling it grinding.  Most systems will give a bit of rubbing at the extremes but the term grinding suggests something more might be going on.  <br />
<br />
What bike is it and where did you get it from?  There is a possibility that the gear changing mechanisms have not been set up particularly well and if this is the case then all sorts of loud grinding noises can be generated.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>DocB</dc:creator>
            <category>The WhyCycle Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 22:43:59 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8062,8064#msg-8064</guid>
            <title>Re: Need Help, I hate Cycling</title>
            <link>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8062,8064#msg-8064</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hiya,<br />
<br />
Thanks for the reply.  Yes I got what he and others were saying about poor choice of gear combinations but what about the grinding?<br />
<br />
I mean, if I bought one of the better bikes that I hear people talking aobut, would the chain also grind when temporarily in certian combinations?<br />
<br />
Thanks,]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Marty Robinson</dc:creator>
            <category>The WhyCycle Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 21:04:09 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8062,8063#msg-8063</guid>
            <title>Re: Need Help, I hate Cycling</title>
            <link>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8062,8063#msg-8063</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Your leader is correct. By using, as you put it, the extremes, all you are doing is wearing out the chain and jockey wheels (the small cogs on the rear gears). There is no need to use these gears as you have almost the same gear in a different combination. eg If you have a triple chainset with 42,32,22 teeth and a 7 speed cassette with 14 to 28 teeth then with the chain on the big ring and big cog you have a gear of 39&quot;. With the chain on the middle ring and the 3rd largest cog (20 teeth) you have a gear of 41&quot;. As its normal to have a difference of about 6&quot; between each gear a 2&quot; difference is negligible.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>COTTERPIN</dc:creator>
            <category>The WhyCycle Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 18:08:28 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8062,8062#msg-8062</guid>
            <title>Need Help, I hate Cycling</title>
            <link>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,8062,8062#msg-8062</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ My wife got me a fairly nice bike but when I took it out on the trails with a group I found that the gears would grind.  I asked the group leader, an experience rider, about the problem and he said that he simply wouldn't use those combination of gears. Now I understand that you are not supposed to habitually use the &quot;Extremes&quot; of small to large gear ratio's but I do use them in passing from time to time and I expect them to work.<br />
<br />
Am I wrong about this??  Is it normal for the chain to grind against another part when I use a certian combination??]]></description>
            <dc:creator>Marty Robinson</dc:creator>
            <category>The WhyCycle Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 17:29:06 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,7988,8061#msg-8061</guid>
            <title>Re: Which tourer?</title>
            <link>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,7988,8061#msg-8061</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Just depends, the original poster says he wanted the bike to last a few years after doing the LEJoG, not just to do LEJoG. Aluminium frames do not absorb the vibrations from the road like a steel one does so are less comfortable on long distances. The Vantage has a lot going for it but is not comparable to a Galaxy.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>cotterpin</dc:creator>
            <category>The WhyCycle Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:28:04 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,7988,8060#msg-8060</guid>
            <title>Re: Which tourer?</title>
            <link>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,7988,8060#msg-8060</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Bill,<br />
<br />
I see a lot of bikes and you know, I really do not agree with you.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>DocB</dc:creator>
            <category>The WhyCycle Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:34:57 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,7981,8059#msg-8059</guid>
            <title>Re: Torn between two hybrids</title>
            <link>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,7981,8059#msg-8059</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Part of my method, well known amongst my customers, is a desire to make sure that they are well informed about what they have and what they are buying. I don't want them to have any surprises.<br />
<br />
So, sorry neilf, but don't worry about it.  Freehubs don't fail very often and if you are unlucky then a new wheel is not the end of the world.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>DocB</dc:creator>
            <category>The WhyCycle Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 13:32:26 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,7988,8058#msg-8058</guid>
            <title>Re: Which tourer?</title>
            <link>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,7988,8058#msg-8058</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Hi. The Raleigh Royal or Dawes Vantage both fall into your price range.<br />
I personally have owned the Vantage for about 2 months and have put over a thousand miles on it in that time. It goes for £600 retail but I got mine for a little over £400 at Evans using their price match deal. <br />
It uses machine built wheels which despite having been bashed to hell on roads and mountain bike type terrain are still holding true. The components are also doing perfectly fine despite their &quot;budget&quot; price tag.<br />
You don't need a £1000 or over bike for anything and that includes world tours. Plenty of folk who have done these world tours will tell you the same. So anyone telling you that you need to spend thousands is basically, full of it.<br />
<br />
Bill]]></description>
            <dc:creator>IrishBill</dc:creator>
            <category>The WhyCycle Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 06:45:10 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,7981,8057#msg-8057</guid>
            <title>Re: Torn between two hybrids</title>
            <link>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,7981,8057#msg-8057</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Rats. Looks like I faff around deciding which bike to buy, and then make the wrong decision!]]></description>
            <dc:creator>neilf</dc:creator>
            <category>The WhyCycle Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 06:14:15 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,7981,8056#msg-8056</guid>
            <title>Re: Torn between two hybrids</title>
            <link>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,7981,8056#msg-8056</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ A quick look at the spec for the giant suggests it is OK for the money.  They actually specify a shimano bottom bracket which is unusual - most of the big boys are fitting cheaper and nowhere near as good, bottom brackets in this price range,<br />
<br />
If you want a naughty question for the dealer you might ask him what he would do if the freehub on the rear wheel failed!  I note it has formula hubs and as far as I know you cannot get replacement free hub bodies for those hubs and so the honest answer to the question is that you would need a new wheel.<br />
<br />
Good luck.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>DocB</dc:creator>
            <category>The WhyCycle Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 19:00:38 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
            <guid>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,7981,8055#msg-8055</guid>
            <title>Re: Torn between two hybrids</title>
            <link>http://www.whycycle.co.uk/whycycle_forum/read.php?1,7981,8055#msg-8055</link>
            <description><![CDATA[ Bit of an update: <br />
The local dealer eventually got the bike in and called me to arrange a test ride. All looking a bit better now. So I went over to their shop, they got the bike out (Specialized Crosstrail which had a lock-out front suspension) and guess what? The lock-out on the front suspension was knackered. This is supposedly a brand new bike!!! <br />
Again - not impressed. They said they would get it fixed and call me back. Weeks later, still nothing, so I went off looking for a better dealer. <br />
Have now decided to get a Giant Roam 2 from another local dealer. It's in stock (ie. in their shop) and I should pick it up in a few days - that's if it stops raining due to the official drought which has been declared. <br />
Feel much better about this dealer, hope he doesn't let me down.]]></description>
            <dc:creator>neilf</dc:creator>
            <category>The WhyCycle Forum</category>
            <pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 16:22:30 +0100</pubDate>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

